Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This feasibility study in 11 tertiary neonatal units did not reach its planned recruitment target and concluded that it would not be feasible to conduct a full pragmatic trial.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Helen Yates 1,*, Virginia Chiocchia 2, Louise Linsell 2, Nicolas Orsi 3, Edmund Juszczak 2, Kathryn Johnson 4, Philip Chetcuti 4, Claire Illingworth 5, Pollyanna Hardy 6, Vaneesha Monk 7, Simon Newell 8,, Mark Turner 9

1 Department of Neonatal Medicine, Women and Children’s Hospital, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
2 NPEU Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3 Women’s Health Research Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
4 Leeds Neonatal Service, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
5 Patient and public involvement representative, ,
6 Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
7 Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
8 Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
9 Neonatal Unit, Liverpool Women’s Hospital, Liverpool, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Helen.yates@hey.nhs.uk

In memoriam

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions