Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

There was no difference in metabolic outcomes with a longer biliopancreatic limb length of 150cm.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Alexander Dimitri MirasORCID logo, Anna KamockaORCID logo, Tricia TanORCID logo, Belén Pérez-PevidaORCID logo, Harvinder Chahal, Krishna Moorthy, Sanjay Purkayastha, Ameet PatelORCID logo, Anne Margot UmplebyORCID logo, Gary FrostORCID logo, Stephen Robert BloomORCID logo, Ahmed Rashid Ahmed & Francesco RubinoORCID logo.

Alexander Dimitri Miras 1,, Anna Kamocka 1,, Tricia Tan 1,, Belén Pérez-Pevida 1, Harvinder Chahal 1, Krishna Moorthy 2, Sanjay Purkayastha 2, Ameet Patel 3, Anne Margot Umpleby 4, Gary Frost 1, Stephen Robert Bloom 1,*,, Ahmed Rashid Ahmed 1,, Francesco Rubino 3,

1 Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Imperial College London, London, UK
2 Department of Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
3 Department of Surgery, King’s College London, London, UK
4 Department of Diabetes and Metabolic Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
* Corresponding author Email: s.bloom@imperial.ac.uk

Equally contributing authors

Equally contributing authors

Declared competing interests of authors: Anna Kamocka is funded by a research fellowship from the Royal College of Surgeons.

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions