Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Improved outcomes after hip and knee replacement had begun before the implementation of the enhanced recovery pathway and successful implementation of this pathway depends on several aspects.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Andrew Judge 1,2,3,4,*, Andrew Carr 1, Andrew Price 1, Cesar Garriga 1,4, Cyrus Cooper 1,3, Daniel Prieto-Alhambra 1,3,4,5, Fraser Old 6, George Peat 7, Jacqueline Murphy 8, Jose Leal 8, Karen Barker 1, Lydia Underdown 1, Nigel Arden 1,3, Rachael Gooberman-Hill 2, Raymond Fitzpatrick 9, Sarah Drew 2,10, Mark G Pritchard 8

1 National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
3 Medical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
4 Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5 GREMPAL Research Group, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
6 Patient representative, ,
7 Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
8 Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
9 Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
10 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
* Corresponding author Emails: andrew.judge@bristol.ac.uk and andrew.judge@ndorms.ox.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document