Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study showed the links identified may be the 'best-bets' for interventions that are effective in changing mechanisms of action and the non-links are unlikely to be effective.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Susan Michie 1,*, Marie Johnston 2, Alexander J Rothman 3, Marijn de Bruin 2,4, Michael P Kelly 5, Rachel N Carey 1, Lauren EC Bohlen 1,6, Hilary NK Groarke 7, Niall C Anderson 1,8, Silje Zink 1,9

1 Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, London, UK
2 Institute of Applied Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
3 Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
4 Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
5 Primary Care Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
6 Department of Kinesiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
7 Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
8 National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
9 National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
* Corresponding author Email: s.michie@ucl.ac.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: none

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document