Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Remediation programmes can work when they develop doctors' insight and motivation, and reinforce behaviour change, along with correcting causal attribution, goal-setting, destigmatising remediation and clarifying consequences.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Tristan Price 1, Nicola Brennan 1,*, Geoff Wong 2, Lyndsey Withers 3, Jennifer Cleland 4, Amanda Wanner 1, Thomas Gale 1, Linda Prescott-Clements 5, Julian Archer 6, Marie Bryce 1

1 Collaboration for the Advancement of Medical Education Research and Assessment (CAMERA), Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
2 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3 Patient partner, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
4 Medical Education Research and Scholarship Unit (MERSU), Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, , Singapore
5 Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, London, UK
6 Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Education Portfolio, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
* Corresponding author Email: nicola.brennan@plymouth.ac.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: Geoff Wong is joint deputy chairperson of the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Prioritisation Committee: Integrated Community Health and Social Care Panel (A) (2015 to present). Amanda Wanner’s role was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula. In addition, Amanda Wanner reports personal fees as a systematic review consultant outside the submitted work.

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document