Care home residents' quality of life and its association with CQC ratings and workforce issues: the MiCareHQ mixed-methods study

Towers, Ann-Marie; Smith, Nick; Allan, Stephen; Vadean, Florin; Collins, Grace; Rand, Stacey; Bostock, Jennifer; Ramsbottom, Helen; Forder, Julien; Lanza, Stefania; Cassell, Jackie

doi:10.3310/hsdr09190

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Extended Research Article

Toolkit

View Award

This study found that care home quality ratings were related to working conditions for staff and positively associated with quality-of-life outcomes for residents.

Ann-Marie Towers , Nick Smith , Stephen Allan , Florin Vadean , Grace Collins , Stacey Rand , Jennifer Bostock , Helen Ramsbottom, Julien Forder , Stefania Lanza & Jackie Cassell .

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Ann-Marie Towers ^1,^*, Nick Smith ², Stephen Allan ², Florin Vadean ², Grace Collins ², Stacey Rand ², Jennifer Bostock ³, Helen Ramsbottom ³, Julien Forder ², Stefania Lanza ⁴, Jackie Cassell ⁴

¹ Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
² Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
³ Public and patient involvement representative, Canterbury, UK
⁴ Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: A.Towers@kent.ac.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: Ann-Marie Towers is a member of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research for Patient Benefit Funding Committee (2018 to present) and a member of the NIHR Research for Social Care Funding Committee (2018 to present). Jennifer Bostock is a member of the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research Funding Committee. Helen Ramsbottom is a member of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Prioritisation Committee.

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*

Name (title, first name, last name)*

Occupation / Job title*

Affiliation / Employer*

Email*

Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas

Statement of competing interests
We believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.

If yes, please provide details below

Enter response title*

Enter CAPTCHA What is seven multiplied by four?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document