Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Non-contact infrared thermometers gave lower average temperature readings than current measurement approaches for children with acute illness and fever sensitivity was poor.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Ann Van den Bruel 1,2,*, Jan Verbakel 1,2, Kay Wang 1, Susannah Fleming 1, Gea Holtman 1,3, Margaret Glogowska 1, Elizabeth Morris 1, George Edwards 1, Fatene Abakar Ismail 1, Kathryn Curtis 1, James Goetz 1, Grace Barnes 1, Ralitsa Slivkova 1, Charlotte Nesbitt 1, Suhail Aslam 1, Ealish Swift 1, Harriet Williams 1, Gail Hayward 1

1 Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 Academic Centre for Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
3 Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
* Corresponding author Email: ann.vandenbruel@kuleuven.be

Declared competing interests of authors: Ann Van den Bruel was a member of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health panel, and was a member of the Diagnosis and Screening Methods group from 2015 to 2018. Gail Hayward was a member of the HTA Commissioning Board. Susannah Fleming was funded under a Programme Grants for Applied Research programme grant with number RP-PG-1210-12003 [Monitoring Long-term Conditions in Primary Care; URL: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/pgfar/rp-pg-1210-12003 (accessed June 2020)] while working on this report.

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document