Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study successfully adapted collaborative care for use in occupational health, but the pilot RCT recruited only 16 from over 1000 potentially eligible participants, so a larger RCT was not feasible.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Cassandra Kenning, Karina Lovell, Mark Hann, Raymond Agius, Penny E Bee, Carolyn Chew-Graham, Peter A Coventry, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis, Simon Gilbody, Gillian Hardy, Stephen Kellett, David Kessler, Dean McMillan, David Reeves, Joanne Rick, Matthew Sutton & Peter Bower.

Cassandra Kenning 1,*, Karina Lovell 2, Mark Hann 1, Raymond Agius 3, Penny E Bee 2, Carolyn Chew-Graham 4, Peter A Coventry 5, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis 6, Simon Gilbody 5, Gillian Hardy 7, Stephen Kellett 7, David Kessler 8, Dean McMillan 5, David Reeves 1, Joanne Rick 1, Matthew Sutton 1, Peter Bower 1

1 Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
2 School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
3 Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
4 Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK
5 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
6 Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
7 Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
8 School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
* Corresponding author Email: cassandra.kenning@manchester.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document