An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.
Page not found (404)
Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.
Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.
Toolkit
Study found that despite longer hospital stay and time to resumption of normal activities, more women were satisfied after hysterectomy than after endometrial ablation. There is some suggestion that Mirena is potentially cheaper and more effective than first-generation ablation techniques, with rates of satisfaction similar to second-generation techniques; there is limited evidence to suggest that hysterectomy is preferable to Mirena. Although the most cost-effective strategy, hysterectomy may not be considered an initial option owing to its invasive nature and higher risk of complications
1 University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
2 University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
3 Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
4 Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
5 Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
* Corresponding author Email: s.bhattacharya@abdn.ac.uk† Corresponding author Email:
Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}
{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}
https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}
Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})
Report Content
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
Responses to this report
No responses have been published.
An error has occurred in processing the XML document