Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Following a plain balloon angioplasty, additional treatment with a paclitaxel-coated balloon does not provide benefit.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Narayan Karunanithy 1,, Emily J Robinson 2,, Francis Calder 1, Anthony Dorling 1,2, Janet L Peacock 2,3, Yanzhong Wang 2, Leanne M Gardner 2, Michael G Robson 1,2,*

1 Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
2 Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
3 Department of Epidemiology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
* Corresponding author Email: Michael.robson@kcl.ac.uk

Joint first authors

Joint first authors

Declared competing interests of authors: Anthony Dorling was an Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Funding Committee member (2014–19) and an EME Funding Committee Sub-Group member – Remit and Compatibility Check (2018–19). Emily J Robinson received salary support from the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust (London, UK) and King’s College London (London, UK).

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

Response by Dr Michael Robson on 30 July 2024 at 3:29 PM
Minor Amendment to text by Senior Author

Two errors appear in this article:
1. Figure 2:  The first ‘withdrawn or censored’ box contains the text "End of ACCP (did not lose TLPP)".  This should simply be "End of ACCP’".
2. Table 5: The lower bound of the range for ‘time (months) since fistula was formed’ is given as "0" months for both groups.  This should be "2" months for both groups.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions