Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Service users and staff are generally satisfied with services designed to help facilitate primary care provision for serious mental illness and these services appear to be cost-saving.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Paul McCrone, Steve Wright, Darshan Zala, Muralikrishnan Radhakrishnan Kartha, Leonardo Koeser, Mark Ashworth, Peter Schofield, Diana Rose, Sarah Corlett, Anita Patel, Robert Stewart, Daniel Stahl, David Whitney & Julia Gannon.

Paul McCrone 1,*, Steve Wright 1, Darshan Zala 1, Muralikrishnan Radhakrishnan Kartha 1, Leonardo Koeser 1, Mark Ashworth 2, Peter Schofield 2, Diana Rose 1, Sarah Corlett 3, Anita Patel 4, Robert Stewart 5, Daniel Stahl 6, David Whitney 2, Julia Gannon 7

1 Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
2 Division of Health & Social Care Research, King’s College London, London, UK
3 Lambeth and Southwark Public Health Department, London, UK
4 Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
5 Psychiatric Epidemiology and Clinical Informatics, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
6 Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
7 Contracts, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: paul.mccrone@kcl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document