Quality and reporting standards, resources, training materials and information for realist evaluation: the RAMESES II project

Wong, Geoff; Westhorp, Gill; Greenhalgh, Joanne; Manzano, Ana; Jagosh, Justin; Greenhalgh, Trisha

doi:10.3310/hsdr05280

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Extended Research Article

Toolkit

View Award

This project developed quality and reporting standards for realist evaluation, and produced online resources and training materials as well as a generic patient information leaflet for lay participants in realist evaluations.

Geoff Wong, Gill Westhorp, Joanne Greenhalgh, Ana Manzano, Justin Jagosh & Trisha Greenhalgh.

Detailed Author information
Detailed Author information

Geoff Wong ^1,^*, Gill Westhorp ², Joanne Greenhalgh ³, Ana Manzano ³, Justin Jagosh ⁴, Trisha Greenhalgh ¹

¹ Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
² Realist Research Evaluation and Learning Initiative, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia
³ Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
⁴ Centre for Advancement in Realist Evaluation and Syntheses (CARES), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
^* Corresponding author Email: grckwong@gmail.com

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Report Content

Full Report
Abstract
Plain English Summary
Plain Language Summary
Scientific Summary

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

Responses to this report

Response by Professor Kim Manley on 8 February 2018 at 9:49 AM
Postive and Useful Resource Thank you
This is an incredibly timely report that provides many insights just when we are writing up a big project - Thank you. the report will help us to write up the report more explicitly and tease out aspects that may have previously been less explicit. I do wish we had the benefit of the standards before we started - well at least we are more aware of the limitations in our study and our learning for next time!

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors. Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

Enter response message*

Name (title, first name, last name)*

Occupation / Job title*

Affiliation / Employer*

Email*

Other authors
For example, if you are responding as a team or group. Please ensure you include full names and separate these using commas

Statement of competing interests
We believe that readers should be aware of any competing interests (conflicts of interest).
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) define competing interests as including: financial relationships with industry (for example through employment, consultancies, stock, ownership, honoraria, and expert testimony), either directly or through immediate family; personal relationships; academic competition; and intellectual passion.

If yes, please provide details below

Enter response title*

Enter CAPTCHA What is thirty divided by five?*

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document