Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Higher nurse staffing levels were associated with fewer missed observations, reduced length of stay and less adverse events, including mortality.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Peter Griffiths 1,2,*, Jane Ball 1,2, Karen Bloor 3, Dankmar Böhning 4, Jim Briggs 5, Chiara Dall’Ora 1,2, Anya De Iongh 6, Jeremy Jones 1, Caroline Kovacs 5, Antonello Maruotti 1, Paul Meredith 2,7, David Prytherch 2,5,7, Alejandra Recio Saucedo 1,2, Oliver Redfern 5, Paul Schmidt 2,7, Nicola Sinden 7, Gary Smith 8

1 Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
2 National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, Southampton, UK
3 Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
4 Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
5 Centre for Healthcare Modelling and Informatics, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
6 Independent lay researcher c/o National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, Southampton, UK
7 Clinical Outcomes Research Group, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
8 Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Peter.griffiths@soton.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document