Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Mortality and other outcomes in older people with cognitive disorders following hospital admission are considerably worse as compared with those without cognitive disorders.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Emma Reynish 1,*, Simona Hapca 2, Rebecca Walesby 1, Angela Pusram 1, Feifei Bu 1, Jennifer K Burton 3, Vera Cvoro 3, James Galloway 4, Henriette Ebbesen Laidlaw 1, Marion Latimer 1, Siobhan McDermott 1, Alasdair C Rutherford 1, Gordon Wilcock 5, Peter Donnan 2, Bruce Guthrie 2

1 Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
2 School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
3 Deanery of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
4 Health Informatics Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
5 Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Emma.Reynish@stir.ac.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: Peter Donnan reports grants from Shire Pharmaceuticals Ltd (London, UK), Gilead Sciences, Inc. (Foster City, CA, USA) and Novo Nordisk (Bagsværd, Denmark) outside the submitted work, and that he is a member of the New Drugs Committee of the Scottish Medicines Consortium. Vera Cvoro reports receiving funded space from the European Stroke Organisation at the European Stroke Organisation Conference 2017, outside the submitted work.

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document