An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.
Page not found (404)
Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.
Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.
Toolkit
This study showed current literature comparing the interventions for chronic thoracic aortic aneurysms was dated and of limited quality, but both were successful for carefully selected patients although timing of the intervention remains challenging.
1 Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
2 Department of Cardiac Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
3 Papworth Trials Unit Collaboration, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
4 Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
5 Medical Research Council (MRC) Biostatistics Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
6 Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
7 Liverpool Vascular & Endovascular Service, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
8 Wessex Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
9 Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
10 Health Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
11 Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Linda.Sharples@lshtm.ac.uk
Declared competing interests of authors: S Rao Vallabhaneni reports unrestricted research grants from Cook Medical (Bloomington, IN, USA) and Terumo Aortic (UK) (Vascutek Ltd, Inchinnan, UK) during the conduct of the study. Colin Bicknell reports personal fees and non-financial support from Medtronic plc (Dublin, Ireland) and grants, personal fees and non-financial support from W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. (Newark, DE, USA), all outside the submitted work. Luke Vale reports that he was a member of the NIHR Health Technology Assessment Clinical Trials and Evaluation Panel (2015–18).
Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}
{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}
https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}
Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})
Report Content
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
Responses to this report
No responses have been published.
An error has occurred in processing the XML document