Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial showed that hip arthroscopy and personalised hip therapy both improved hip-related quality of life but hip arthroscopy led to greater improvements at 12 months.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Damian R Griffin 1,2,*, Edward J Dickenson 1,2, Felix Achana 1, James Griffin 1, Joanna Smith 2, Peter DH Wall 1,2, Alba Realpe 1, Nick Parsons 1, Rachel Hobson 1, Jeremy Fry 3, Marcus Jepson 4, Stavros Petrou 1, Charles Hutchinson 1,2, Nadine Foster 5, Jenny Donovan 4

1 Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
2 University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
3 Lay person, Reading, UK
4 Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
5 Arthritis Research UK Primary Care Centre, Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences NIHR, Keele University, Keele, UK
* Corresponding author Email: damian.griffin@warwick.ac.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: Damian R Griffin is a surgeon with a hip preservation practice that includes treating femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and hip arthroscopy, and he reports consulting and teaching fees from Stryker UK (Newbury, UK) and Smith & Nephew UK (Watford, UK), outside the submitted work. Joanna Smith is a physiotherapist who treats patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Peter DH Wall is a hip surgeon who treats patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Nadine Foster is a member of Clinical Trial Units that were funded by the National Institute for Health Research until 2021 and was a member of the Health Technology Assessment Primary Care, Community and Preventive Interventions Panel (2010–15). Jenny Donovan reports membership of the Rapid Trials and Add-on Studies Board (2012 to present) and the Health Technology Assessment Commissioning Committee (2006–12).

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document