Health Technology Assessment

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of low-intensity psychological interventions for the secondary prevention of relapse after depression: a systematic review

  • Type:
    Extended Research Article Our publication formats
  • Headline:
    Study finds inadequate evidence to determine the clinical effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of low-intensity interventions for the prevention of relapse or recurrence of depression.
  • Authors:
    M Rodgers,
    M Asaria,
    S Walker,
    D McMillan,
    M Lucock,
    M Harden,
    S Palmer,
    A Eastwood
    Detailed Author information

    M Rodgers1,*, M Asaria2, S Walker2, D McMillan3, M Lucock4,5, M Harden1, S Palmer2, A Eastwood1

    • 1 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
    • 2 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
    • 3 Hull York Medical School and Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
    • 4 South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, UK
    • 5 University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
  • Funding:
    Health Technology Assessment programme
  • Journal:
  • Issue:
    Volume: 16, Issue: 28
  • Published:
  • Citation:
    HTA Technology Assessment Report. Rodgers M, Asaria M, Walker S, McMillan D, Lucock M, Harden M, et al. Volume 16, number 28. Published May 2012. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of low-intensity psychological interventions for the secondary prevention of relapse after depression: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2012;16(28). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta16280
  • DOI:
Crossmark status check