Health Technology Assessment

Interventions for adult Eustachian tube dysfunction: A systematic review

  • Type:
    Extended Research Article Our publication formats
  • Headline:
    This systematic review found insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of any intervention for adults with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). The quality of the evidence was generally poor. Evidence was insufficient to allow recommendation of a trial of any particular intervention. Further research is needed to establish a definition of ETD, its relation to broader middle ear ventilation problems and clear diagnostic criteria.
  • Authors:
    Alexis Llewellyn,
    Gill Norman,
    Melissa Harden,
    Andrew Coatesworth,
    Daniel Kimberling,
    Anne Schilder,
    Catriona McDaid
    Detailed Author information

    Alexis Llewellyn1, Gill Norman1, Melissa Harden1, Andrew Coatesworth2, Daniel Kimberling3, Anne Schilder4, Catriona McDaid1,*

    • 1 Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
    • 2 Ear, Nose and Throat Department, York Hospital, York, UK
    • 3 Gale Farm Surgery, York, UK
    • 4 evidENT University College London Ear Institute, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital University College London, London, UK
    • * Corresponding author
  • Journal:
  • Issue:
    Volume: 18, Issue: 46
  • Published:
  • Citation:
    NICE Technology Assessment Report. Llewellyn A, Norman G, Harden M, Coatesworth A, Kimberling D, Schilder A, et al.
    . Interventions for adult Eustachian tube dysfunction: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2014;18(46). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta18460
  • DOI:
Crossmark status check