Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Digital interventions may offer good value for money compared with 'doing nothing', but their added value in relation to medication, face-to-face therapy and printed manuals is uncertain.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Lina Gega 1,2,3,*, Dina Jankovic 4, Pedro Saramago 4, David Marshall 5, Sarah Dawson 6,7, Sally Brabyn 1, Georgios F Nikolaidis 4, Hollie Melton 5, Rachel Churchill 5,6, Laura Bojke 4

1 Department of Health and Social Care Sciences, University of York, York, UK
2 Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
3 Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
4 Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
5 Centre for Reviews & Dissemination, University of York, York, UK
6 Common Mental Disorders Group, Cochrane Collaboration, University of York, York, UK
7 Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
* Corresponding author Email: lina.gega@york.ac.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: Lina Gega report grants from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) during the conduct of the study (NIHR201174). Lina Gega also received personal fees from NIHR outside the submitted work. Pedro Saramago reports grants from NIHR during the conduct of the study. Rachel Churchill report grants from NIHR during the conduct of the study (NIHR127810, PB-PG-1217-20041 and NIHR 17/63/130). Laura Bojke report grants from NIHR during the conduct of the study (NIHR128833). Laura Bojke is also a member of the NIHR Health and Social Care Delivery Research Researcher-led Panel.

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document