Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial found that sensory integration therapy for children with autism and sensory processing difficulties did not demonstrate clinical benefit above standard care.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Elizabeth Randell 1,*, Melissa Wright 1, Sarah Milosevic 1, David Gillespie 1, Lucy Brookes-Howell 1, Monica Busse-Morris 1, Richard Hastings 2, Wakunyambo Maboshe 1, Rhys Williams-Thomas 1, Laura Mills 1, Renee Romeo 3, Nahel Yaziji 3, Anne Marie McKigney 4, Alka Ahuja 4, Gemma Warren, Eleni Glarou 1,5, Sue Delport 6,, Rachel McNamara 1,

1 Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
2 Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal, and Research (CEDAR) University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
3 Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
4 Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK
5 Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
6 School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
* Corresponding author Email: RandellE@cardiff.ac.uk

Joint last/senior author

Joint last/senior author

Declared competing interests of authors: David Gillespie was an associate member of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) General Committee (2019 to September 2021) and is a member of the NIHR HTA Commissioning Committee (September 2021 to present).

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document