Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This trial showed the Hughes abdominal closure did not significantly reduce the incidence of incisional hernias at 1 year compared with standard mass closure in colorectal cancer patients.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Susan O’Connell 1, Saiful Islam 2, Bernadette Sewell 3, Angela Farr 3, Laura Knight 1, Nadim Bashir 2, Rhiannon Harries 4, Sian Jones 5, Andrew Cleves 1, Greg Fegan 2, Alan Watkins 2, Jared Torkington 6,*

1 Cedar Healthcare Technology Research Centre, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
2 Swansea Trials Unit, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
3 Swansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
4 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
5 Public and patient involvement, , UK
6 Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Jared.Torkington@wales.nhs.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: Alan Watkins reports membership of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research Funding Committee (2018–present). Alan Watkins also served as a member of the NIHR’s College of Experts in 2020.

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document