Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Trial finds limited evidence for the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of joint reminiscence groups for people with dementia and their family caregivers.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

RT Woods, E Bruce, RT Edwards, R Elvish, Z Hoare, B Hounsome, J Keady, ED Moniz-Cook, V Orgeta, M Orrell, J Rees & IT Russell.

RT Woods 1,*, E Bruce 2, RT Edwards 3, R Elvish 4, Z Hoare 5, B Hounsome 3, J Keady 4, ED Moniz-Cook 6, V Orgeta 7, M Orrell 7, J Rees 8, IT Russell 9

1 Dementia Services Development Centre Wales, Institute of Medical and Social Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
2 Bradford Dementia Group, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
3 Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Institute of Medical and Social Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
4 School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester/Greater Manchester West Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
5 North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health (and Social Care), Institute of Medical & Social Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
6 Centre for Mental Health and Aging, Humber Mental Health Teaching NHS Trust, Coltman Street Day Hospital, Kingston-upon-Hull, UK
7 Department of Mental Health Sciences, University College London, London, UK
8 Aneurin Bevan Health Board, Ystrad Mynach Hospital, Ystrad Mynach Hengoed, UK
9 North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health (and Social Care), Institute of Medical & Social Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK and West Wales Organisation for Rigorous Trials in Health and Social Care, Swansea University College of Medicine, Swansea, UK
* Corresponding author Email: b.woods@bangor.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document