An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.
Page not found (404)
Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.
Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.
Toolkit
Two automated retinal image analysis systems achieved acceptable sensitivity and false positive rates for referable retinopathy, compared to human graders, and were cost saving.
1 National Institute for Health Research Moorfields Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
2 Population Health Research Institute, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
3 Department of Social Policy, LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
4 Homerton University Hospital Foundation Trust, London, UK
5 Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK
6 Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA
7 Centre for Health Informatics & Multiprofessional Education (CHIME), Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: adnan.tufail@moorfields.nhs.uk
Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}
{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}
https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}
Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})
Report Content
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.
Responses to this report
No responses have been published.
An error has occurred in processing the XML document