Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Transfusing critically ill patients with blood stored for fewer than 7 days rather than blood stored for up to 35 days conferred no clinical or economic benefit.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Timothy S Walsh 1,*, Simon Stanworth 2,3,4, Julia Boyd 5, David Hope 6, Sue Hemmatapour 7, Helen Burrows 7, Helen Campbell 8, Elena Pizzo 9, Nicholas Swart 9, Stephen Morris 9

1 Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Division of Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2 Department of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
3 NHS Blood and Transplant, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
4 Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
5 Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
6 Edinburgh Critical Care Research Group, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
7 Department of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
8 National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
9 Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: twalsh@staffmail.ed.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document