Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Early pulmonary rehabilitation was difficult to recruit to and deliver in hospitals compared to home-based sessions so a full RCT would not be feasible, although data collected may inform future trial design.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Matthew Cox 1, Catherine O’Connor 1, Katie Biggs 2,*, Daniel Hind 2, Oscar Bortolami 2, Matthew Franklin 3, Barbara Collins 4, Stephen Walters 2, Allan Wailoo 3, Julie Channell 5, Paul Albert 5, Ursula Freeman 1, Stephen Bourke 6, Michael Steiner 7, Jon Miles 8, Tom O’Brien 1, David McWilliams 9, Terry Schofield 1, John O’Reilly 5, Rodney Hughes 1

1 Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
2 Design, Trials and Statistics (DTS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
3 Health Economics and Decision Science (HEDS), School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
4 Simbiotic Consulting Limited, Glasgow, UK
5 Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
6 Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
7 University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
8 Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust, Rotherham, UK
9 University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
* Corresponding author Email: c.e.biggs@sheffield.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document