Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Ergometrine plus oxytocin, misoprostol plus oxytocin and carbetocin were more effective for preventing postpartum haemorrhage than the standard oxytocin, but ergometrine plus oxytocin and misoprostol plus oxytocin caused significant side effects.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Ioannis Gallos 1,*, Helen Williams 1, Malcolm Price 2, Karen Pickering 2, Abi Merriel 1, Aurelio Tobias 1, David Lissauer 1, Harry Gee 1, Özge Tunçalp 3, Gillian Gyte 4,5, Vidhya Moorthy 1, Tracy Roberts 2, Jonathan Deeks 2, Justus Hofmeyr 6, Metin Gülmezoglu 3, Arri Coomarasamy 1

1 Tommy’s National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
2 Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
3 Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
4 Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Centre for Women’s Health Research, Liverpool Women’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
5 National Childbirth Trust, London, UK
6 Effective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand/Fort Hare, Eastern Cape Department of Health, East London, South Africa
* Corresponding author Email: i.d.gallos@bham.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document