Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Magnetic resonance enterography was more sensitive than ultrasonography in diagnosing the extent of small bowel disease and both were broadly acceptable to patients.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Stuart A Taylor 1,*, Sue Mallett 2, Gauraang Bhatnagar 1, Stephen Morris 3, Laura Quinn 2, Florian Tomini 3, Anne Miles 4, Rachel Baldwin-Cleland 5, Stuart Bloom 6, Arun Gupta 5, Peter John Hamlin 7, Ailsa L Hart 8, Antony Higginson 9, Ilan Jacobs 10, Sara McCartney 6, Charles D Murray 11, Andrew AO Plumb 1, Richard C Pollok 12, Manuel Rodriguez-Justo 13, Zainib Shabir 14, Andrew Slater 15, Damian Tolan 16, Simon Travis 17, Alastair Windsor 18, Peter Wylie 19, Ian Zealley 20, Steve Halligan 1

1 Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
2 Institute of Applied Health Research, National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
3 Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
4 Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK
5 Intestinal Imaging Centre, St Mark’s Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
6 Department of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital, London, UK
7 Department of Gastroenterology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
8 Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St Mark’s Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Harrow, UK
9 Department of Radiology, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
10 Independent patient representative, c/o Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
11 Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
12 Department of Gastroenterology, St George’s Hospital, London, UK
13 Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital, London, UK
14 Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
15 Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
16 Department of Radiology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
17 Translational Gastroenterology Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
18 Department of Surgery, University College Hospital, London, UK
19 Department of Radiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
20 Department of Radiology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK
* Corresponding author Email: stuart.taylor@ucl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document