Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

CBT plus usual care, delivered by clinical rheumatology teams, reduced fatigue impact in rheumatoid arthritis at 26 weeks beyond usual care alone, but with uncertain cost-effectiveness.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Sarah Hewlett 1,*, Celia Almeida 1, Nicholas Ambler 2, Peter S Blair 3, Ernest Choy 4, Emma Dures 1, Alison Hammond 5, William Hollingworth 3, Bryar Kadir 3, John Kirwan 6, Zoe Plummer 1, Clive Rooke 7, Joanna Thorn 3, Nicholas Turner 3, Jonathan Pollock 8

1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, UK
2 Pain Management Centre, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
3 Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
4 Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
5 Centre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, UK
6 Academic Rheumatology, Department of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
7 Patient Research Partner, Academic Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
8 Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Sarah.Hewlett@uwe.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document