Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Glyceryl trinitrate spray did not reduce the need for manual removal of retained placenta following vaginal delivery.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Fiona C Denison 1,*, Kathryn F Carruthers 1, Jemma Hudson 2, Gladys McPherson 2, Graham Scotland 3, Sheonagh Brook-Smith 4,, Cynthia Clarkson 1, Mathilde Peace 1, Jane Brewin 5, Gin Nie Chua 3, Nina Hallowell 6, Jane E Norman 1, Julia Lawton 7, John Norrie 8

1 Tommy’s Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health Research, Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen’s Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
2 Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
3 Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
4 Simpson’s Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
5 Tommy’s, Nicholas House, London, UK
6 Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
7 Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
8 Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit/Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Denison@ed.ac.uk

In memoriam

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document