Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The two procedures were similar in terms of urinary symptom scores over 24 months.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Robert Pickard 1,, Beatriz Goulao 2, Sonya Carnell 3, Jing Shen 4, Graeme MacLennan 5, John Norrie 6, Matt Breckons 4, Luke Vale 4,*, Paul Whybrow 7, Tim Rapley 8, Rebecca Forbes 3, Stephanie Currer 3, Mark Forrest 5, Jennifer Wilkinson 3, Elaine McColl 4, Daniela Andrich 9, Stewart Barclay 10, Jonathan Cook 11, Anthony Mundy 9, James N’Dow 12, Stephen Payne 13, Nick Watkin 14

1 Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
2 Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
3 Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
4 Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
5 Centre for Healthcare and Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
6 Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
7 Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK
8 Social Work, Education & Community Wellbeing, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
9 University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
10 Patient representative, ,
11 Oxford Clinical Trials Research Unit, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
12 Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
13 Central Manchester Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
14 St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: luke.vale@newcastle.ac.uk

In memoriam

In memoriam

Declared competing interests of authors: Robert Pickard, Graeme MacLennan, John Norrie, Luke Vale, Tim Rapley, Elaine McColl, Daniela Andrich and Jonathan Cook report grants from the NHS [National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)] during the conduct of the study. John Norrie reports membership of the following NIHR boards: Commissioning Priority Review Decision-making committee (2015); Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Commissioning Board (2010–16); HTA Commissioning Sub-Board (Expression of Interest) (2014); HTA Funding Boards Policy Group (2016–19); HTA General Board (2014–18); HTA Post-Board funding teleconference (2016–19); NIHR Clinical Trials Unit Standing Advisory Committee (2018–present); NIHR HTA and Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Editorial Board (2014–19); Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Impact Review Panel (2017). Luke Vale reports membership of NIHR HTA Clinical Evaluation and Trials panel from 2015 to March 2018. Elaine McColl reports grants from the NIHR Journals Library outside the submitted work. In addition, from 2013 to 2016 Elaine McColl was a member of the NIHR Journals Library Editorial Group. Jonathan Cook was a member of the HTA Efficient Study Designs Board (2014–16) during part of this study’s duration. James N’Dow was a member of the HTA General Board (2016 to March 2018).

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document