Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This research programme identified and prioritised a set of potential ambulance quality measures that reflected preferences of services and users.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index < metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Janette Turner 1, A Niroshan Siriwardena 2,3,*, Joanne Coster 1, Richard Jacques 1, Andy Irving 1, Annabel Crum 1, Helen Bell Gorrod 1, Jon Nicholl 1, Viet-Hai Phung 2, Fiona Togher 2, Richard Wilson 1, Alicia O’Cathain 1, Andrew Booth 1, Daniel Bradbury 1, Steve Goodacre 1, Anne Spaight 3, Jane Shewan 4, Richard Pilbery 4, Daniel Fall 5, Maggie Marsh 5, Andrea Broadway-Parkinson 5, Ronan Lyons 6, Helen Snooks 6, Mike Campbell 1

1 School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
2 Community and Health Research Unit (CaHRU), University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
3 East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
4 Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust, Wakefield, UK
5 Patient and public involvement, Sheffield, UK
6 College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
* Corresponding author Email: nsiriwardena@lincoln.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation: {{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al.' : ''}} . {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

 

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions