Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Girls Active did not have an effect on moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity at 14 months, and there were barriers to implementation although it was viewed positively.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Deirdre M Harrington 1,*, Melanie J Davies 1,2,3, Danielle Bodicoat 1,4, Joanna M Charles 5, Yogini V Chudasama 1, Trish Gorely 6, Kamlesh Khunti 1,3,4, Alex V Rowlands 1,2,7, Lauren B Sherar 8, Rhiannon Tudor-Edwards 5, Thomas Yates 1,2, Charlotte L Edwardson 1,2

1 Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
2 National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
3 Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
4 Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands, Leicester, UK
5 Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
6 Department of Nursing, School of Health, Social Care and Life Sciences, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK
7 Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
8 School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
* Corresponding author Email: dh204@le.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document