Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

The MenSS website was broadly well received and a full RCT could be helpful, but this study was hampered by technical problems and poor response rates: further work is needed

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Julia V Bailey, Rosie Webster, Rachael Hunter, Mark Griffin, Nicholas Freemantle, Greta Rait, Claudia Estcourt, Susan Michie, Jane Anderson, Judith Stephenson, Makeda Gerressu, Chee Siang Ang & Elizabeth Murray.

Julia V Bailey 1,*, Rosie Webster 1, Rachael Hunter 2, Mark Griffin 2, Nicholas Freemantle 2, Greta Rait 2, Claudia Estcourt 3, Susan Michie 4, Jane Anderson 5, Judith Stephenson 6, Makeda Gerressu 7, Chee Siang Ang 8, Elizabeth Murray 1

1 E-Health unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
2 PRIMENT Clinical Trials Unit, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
3 Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Barts Sexual Health Centre, Queen Mary University of London, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK
4 Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
5 Homerton Sexual Health Services, Homerton Teaching Hospitals, London, UK
6 Department of Reproductive Health, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
7 Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
8 Engineering and Digital Arts, University of Kent, Kent, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Julia.bailey@ucl.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document