Journals Library

Advanced

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Home >> Journals >> Public Health Research >> Page Not Found

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

Home >> Journals >> Public Health Research >> Volume {{metadata.Volume}} >> Issue {{metadata.Issue}}
Extended Research Article
i

View Award

This follow-up study to the BB:0-2 trial observed no benefit for child in need status registered by age 6 years.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Michael Robling 1,2,*, Fiona Lugg-Widger 1, Rebecca Cannings-John 1, Julia Sanders 3, Lianna Angel 2, Sue Channon 1, Deborah Fitzsimmons 4, Kerenza Hood 1, Joyce Kenkre 5, Gwenllian Moody 1, Eleri Owen-Jones 1, Rhys Pockett 4, Jeremy Segrott 1,2, Thomas Slater 6

1 Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
2 Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
3 School of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
4 Swansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
5 Faculty of Life Sciences and Education, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
6 School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
* Corresponding author Email: RoblingMR@cardiff.ac.uk

Declared competing interests of authors: Kerenza Hood is a member of National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) General Committee (2016–present), the NIHR HTA Funding Committee Policy Group (2017–present) and the NIHR Research Professors Panel (2019–present). Rebecca Cannings-John was a NIHR HTA Associate Board Member (May 2018–March 2020).

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

Response by Dr Fiona Lugg-Widger on 24 January 2023 at 7:47 AM
Minor Amendment to text by the Report authors

As authors of this study report, we would like to submit an amendment to Table 11.

Hospital attendance and/or hospital admission n (%) should read 324 (42.7) (and not, as written, 52.7).

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document

© NIHR 2024