Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

This study found a relatively high prevalence of dementia/mild cognitive impairment in prisons and it developed a care pathway and training materials for staff and prisoners.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Katrina Forsyth 1, Leanne Heathcote 1, Jane Senior 1,*, Baber Malik 1, Rachel Meacock 1, Katherine Perryman 1, Sue Tucker 1, Rachel Domone 2, Matthew Carr 1, Helen Hayes 1, Roger Webb 1, Laura Archer-Power 3, Alice Dawson 1, Sarah Leonard 1, David Challis 4, Stuart Ware 5, Richard Emsley 1, Caroline Sanders 1, Salman Karim 2, Seena Fazel 6, Adrian Hayes 7, Alistair Burns 1, Mary Piper 5, Jenny Shaw 1

1 Offender Health Research Network, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
2 Lancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
3 Cheshire and Greater Manchester Community Rehabilitation Company, Manchester, UK
4 Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
5 Restore Support Network, Exeter Council for Voluntary Service, Exeter, UK
6 Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
7 Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust, Bath, UK
* Corresponding author Email: Jane.Senior@manchester.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document